Skip to content
Circular Home
Issue 29 - April 2017

Unpaid determinations update

 

Since the last update on the December 2016 quarter, there have been three new Financial Services Providers (FSPs) added to the non-compliance list. As at the end of the March 2017 quarter, these three FSPs have not complied with eight determinations.

As a result, between the commencement of the single Terms of Reference on 1 January 2010 and 31 March 2017, the figures have increased to:

  • 38 FSPs who are unwilling or unable to comply with 151 determinations, affecting 214 consumers;
  • In 113 of these determinations, the consumer received no payments at all, despite the requirement on AFSL holders to have ‘adequate compensation arrangements’ in place;
  • Of the remaining 38 determination, partial payment to consumers was usually the proceeds of insolvency proceedings and represented a minimal return on the dollar
  • As a result of this non-compliance, $13,909,635.50 has not been returned to affected consumers.
  • This figure does not include any interest awarded on the base award by the Ombudsman, nor does it include any adjustments for inflation over time.

Only a very small percentage of all FOS members are involved, and these figures represent only a small proportion of all the awards we issue across all our jurisdictions in banking, insurance, life insurance and investments.

However, despite the small number of FSPs involved, unpaid determinations represent 18.2% of all accepted determinations issued in favour of consumers by the Investments and Advice (I&A) team. As a proportion of total compensation awarded by the I&A team, the value of unpaid determinations is 24.8%.

The issue of non-compliance is not spread evenly throughout different sectors of the financial services industry. The top three categories of non-compliant financial services providers are:

  1. Financial Planners and Advisors: 53%
  2. Operators of Managed Investment Schemes: 13%
  3. Credit Providers: 11%


New issues arising
The unpaid determinations reporting runs from 1 January 2010. The rights to payment under the FOS contract are subject, like all other debts, to limitation periods within which recovery can be made.

Due to the time that has elapsed, $1,134,597.45 worth of unpaid claims across 17 determinations accepted prior to 31 March 2011 have become statute barred.
 

Possible actions to address uncompensated losses
FOS is heartened by the comments made by the independent expert panel reviewing external dispute resolution and complaint framework for the financial system in support of a compensation scheme of last resort for consumers of financial services.

While the panel has only made interim recommendations at this stage, support for such a compensation scheme is growing and it is hoped that this important gap in the current regulatory framework can be addressed. 

FOS believes that it is essential for the effective operation of external dispute resolution that consumers who get an award of compensation by FOS can be confident that this compensation will be paid.

null